A curated series of posts

Shoddy science

Dissecting poor science in trauma and dissociation

This series critiques flawed or ideologically-driven research in the dissociative disorders field, from advocacy-based affirmations to skeptical dismissals. It focuses on circular logic, methodological weaknesses, and the misuse of scientific language to reinforce pre-existing narratives about dissociation.

Coming soon in this series

  • The DES debacle: what are we actually measuring?
  • Sampling bias and self-report in dissociation research
  • Motivated skepticism in dissociation research
  • Advocacy in the lab: when belief shapes the baseline

Questions? Comments?
Contact me